Buy an essay: Critiques of Globalization

The main critical thesis about globalization concerns defining the severity of the price of its adoption. Cruelty of the reculturalization of the peoples, who have respect to their past, but at the same time understand the fatality of lagging behind the most developed countries, is extremely painful. This flour makes most reasonable scientists and analysts draw the negative, critical side of their temperament not just to the price of joining the processes of globalization, but to the globalization process itself.
A large part of the critics see globalization as a mask used by certain economic circles to mute the voice of an individual citizen who becomes a victim of the rules imposed on him. Social critics suggest that the first thing the pathways of globalization do in each individual society is that they buy mass media, because they want to make the embittered citizen who insist on his rights into the “sterile” consumer-conformist. The loss of citizen’s participation in the historical process and turning a citizen into a detached observer promote the illusion of involvement, even if the fictional character of this involvement becomes apparent (Scholte, 2005).
In developed countries, globalization has met opposition from both the left side of the political spectrum, and on its right flank. The Left see the suffering of millions and super-benefication of millionaires, satisfaction of the United States by the course of modernization, and injustice of material punishment of millions of workers only for the fact that their production process was not the most efficient in the world. Complacency of satisfied leaders and lack of solidarity with the less lucky partners in the global production contribute to the mass protest against globalization on the left flank after the collapse of the eastern system of social democracy (Donahue and Nye, 2000; Scholte, 2005).
In addition to social criticism, there are active manifestations of cultural opposition, nationalism, and self-assertion of the right. In Europe, the opponents of globalization processes have become (against the weakening of the left, even along with this attenuation) the right-wing parties – the German People’s Party, the Freedom Party of Austria, and the Australian One Nation Party. Their allies among the developing countries are the trade unions of developed countries that lose jobs in the process of establishing foreign affiliates of MNCs (Donahue and Nye, 2000).
Globalization does not soften global inequality, but strengthens it. D. Donahue and J. Nye (2000) argue that despite the expectations of theorists, the information revolution (a radical change in the 20th century of the instrumental framework, modes of transmission and storage of information, as well as the amount of information available to the active part of the population) did not decentralize world power and did not equalize the states and their economies between each other.
According to Ellwood (2010), globalization is an erroneous and harmful project having an inordinate influence on global economic and financial institutions. The capital that broke through to the global expanse is vitally interested in creating a world system that would guarantee the hostile confrontation of workers from different countries, the opportunities for transnational monopolies to seek and find those places and countries where wages would be minimal, taxes low, government intervention imperceptible, and subsidies to start-ups maximum. For these critics, globalization is a manifestation of corporate power of global capitalism.

No Comments Yet.

Leave a comment